<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s So Simple! Just Ask Diane Sawyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news-political.com/2009/06/06/its-so-simple-just-ask-diane-sawyer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news-political.com/2009/06/06/its-so-simple-just-ask-diane-sawyer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:28:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay Henderson</title>
		<link>http://news-political.com/2009/06/06/its-so-simple-just-ask-diane-sawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news-political.com/?p=2924#comment-361</guid>
		<description>I will always have a soft spot in my heart (or is it my head?) for Diane Sawyer because of the days when she would show up uninvited with her camera crew to interview some clod who had been caught red-handed doing something criminal.  &quot;Ambush journalism,&quot; they call it now, and (except for Diane Sawyer, of course - - how could she?) make with the tsk-tsking and eye-rolling when Fox News uses that once-MSM tactic.

On to the substance: in &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;theory,&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; I am not opposed to a federal-level gas tax increase as a means of encouraging conservation of petroleum resources; there are ways in which such a tax would be fair and produce the desired result.  In practice, such a tax won&#039;t work for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that the revenues would end up in the Federal treasury where they would be squandered. In addition, any program administered by the current Feds would be subject to the politics of redistribution, such that the taxes collected, minus waste and maladministration expenses, would be used to subsidize the poor driving/conservation habits of enough of the population that the end result would be negative. Worse than squandered - - used to produce a bad result. See, e.g., corn ethanol; heating oil assistance.

So, Diane, honey . . . loved your act, but I&#039;m not buying into your gas-tax &lt;i&gt;schtick&lt;/i&gt; until you and your cohorts have cleaned up that act in Washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will always have a soft spot in my heart (or is it my head?) for Diane Sawyer because of the days when she would show up uninvited with her camera crew to interview some clod who had been caught red-handed doing something criminal.  &#8220;Ambush journalism,&#8221; they call it now, and (except for Diane Sawyer, of course &#8211; - how could she?) make with the tsk-tsking and eye-rolling when Fox News uses that once-MSM tactic.</p>
<p>On to the substance: in <i><b>theory,</b></i> I am not opposed to a federal-level gas tax increase as a means of encouraging conservation of petroleum resources; there are ways in which such a tax would be fair and produce the desired result.  In practice, such a tax won&#8217;t work for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that the revenues would end up in the Federal treasury where they would be squandered. In addition, any program administered by the current Feds would be subject to the politics of redistribution, such that the taxes collected, minus waste and maladministration expenses, would be used to subsidize the poor driving/conservation habits of enough of the population that the end result would be negative. Worse than squandered &#8211; - used to produce a bad result. See, e.g., corn ethanol; heating oil assistance.</p>
<p>So, Diane, honey . . . loved your act, but I&#8217;m not buying into your gas-tax <i>schtick</i> until you and your cohorts have cleaned up that act in Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foutsc</title>
		<link>http://news-political.com/2009/06/06/its-so-simple-just-ask-diane-sawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>foutsc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 18:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news-political.com/?p=2924#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Good article, Blaine.  I&#039;ve been wondering much the same about these Ad Council ads.  Do we really need big daddy reminding us to save 5 cents by unplugging our cell phone charger or telling internet savvy kids that if they post naked pictures of themselves on the web, everybody can see it?

My favorite is feed the pig.  feedthepig.org
It is a great organization but it totally goes against the government&#039;s wishes that we all spend like there&#039;s no tomorrow.
A perfect example of the government working at cross purposes with itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, Blaine.  I&#8217;ve been wondering much the same about these Ad Council ads.  Do we really need big daddy reminding us to save 5 cents by unplugging our cell phone charger or telling internet savvy kids that if they post naked pictures of themselves on the web, everybody can see it?</p>
<p>My favorite is feed the pig.  feedthepig.org<br />
It is a great organization but it totally goes against the government&#8217;s wishes that we all spend like there&#8217;s no tomorrow.<br />
A perfect example of the government working at cross purposes with itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: austin tx personal trainers</title>
		<link>http://news-political.com/2009/06/06/its-so-simple-just-ask-diane-sawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>austin tx personal trainers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news-political.com/?p=2924#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Diane Sawyer has such a condescending tone about her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diane Sawyer has such a condescending tone about her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
