$4,500 for this piece of cr*p? YEE-HAH!

Cash-for-clunkers is one of those liberal b*llsh*t ideas that seems to make sense on paper but produces bad results in practice.  In common with just about all spending bills in the new Obamamerica, it is designed to reward Democratic supporters and the expense of non-supporters, i.e., most of us.  The basic premise is simple: the Federal government will pay from $3,500 up to $4,500 to each person trading in a “gas guzzler” for a “fuel-efficient” vehicle.  In reality, the measure will reward bad behavior without making a real dent in overall fleet mileage (would you believe that the target “improvement” is 4 mpg???).

Yup . . . 4 mpg, and that’s for cars.  Trade in an 18 mpg guzzler for an “fuel-efficient” 22 mpg sedan, and you get a $3,500 Obamabonus.  For light trucks {pickups, vans, suvs), it’s worse . . . trade in a 16 mpg van on a new model that gets a whopping 18 mpg, and Uncle Sugardaddy sends you $3,500.

If you’re wondering WHY?, the answer is easy.  The Cash for Clunkers bill is not an environmental measure; it is designed to help move unsold inventories of cars, vans, SUVs, and light trucks off the lots to benefit the now-Government-owned automakers and so that United Auto Workers job losses will be avoided:

Car companies and the United Auto Workers union are pushing a version that passed the House on Tuesday as a way to spur auto sales that have plunged as the economy has fallen into a deep recession. . . . The House version, sponsored by Rep. Betty Sutton (D-Ohio), would give consumers a voucher of up to $4,500 to trade in their gas-guzzling cars for more efficient models as a way to support car companies, workers and dealerships. . . . The bill, which passed by a 298-119 vote, authorizes $4 billion for the program. House sponsors are now talking about adding $1 billion to the war-spending bill that is under negotiation to pay for the effort. . . . The remaining $3 billion would then come from follow-on appropriations bills. . . . Charles Territo, a spokesman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, said that even a scaled-back bill would provide struggling auto companies a needed cash infusion.

‘Cash for Clunkers’ bill: concerns on cost, environmental gains.

A “needed cash infusion”??? What in the #&^^ have those morons done with the $110,000,000,000.00 they’ve already sucked out of our wallets?  It is unclear whether the program will have any net benefit, other than, of course, providing a personal bailout for the irresponsible:

If Congress succeeds in pushing through a Cash for Clunkers program, it is expected to cost taxpayers somewhere in the neighborhood of $4 billion, yet it is increasingly unclear what real benefits — either economic or environmental— we will get for that investment. Ironically, any improvements in fuel efficiency the Cash for Clunkers program may achieve will be far less than those anticipated from the Obama administration’s new CAFE standards, which mandate a combined average fuel efficiency of 39 mpg for passenger cars and 30 mpg for light trucks by 2016.

House Passes Cash for Clunkers Bill; Taxpayers are Left to Wonder Why.

Speaking only for myself – - I have never had a personal motor vehicle which got less than 22 mpg, and I’ve been a car owner since 1969.  For saving thousands of gallons of fuel while driving VW Beetles and Ford Escorts, I am to be punished by having money extracted from my taxes to be paid to a profligate who had the bad judgment to buy a fuel-sucking SUV.  Gosh, is there any other way the Obamacrats can punish me for doing the right thing?

Oh, yes, I forget . . . health care.  Excuse me while I slip into apoplexy.

Liberals have been employing “sanctuary cities” across the nation that flouted federal immigration laws. Now conservatives are taking that same idea to have “sanctuary states” to protect their citizens’ 2nd Amendment rights against liberal tyranny. And Montana, Utah, and Texas are leading the nation in standing up to the federal government’s unconstitutional laws in direct violation of states’ rights.

Montana Governor Brian D. Schweitzer, for what it’s worth, is a Democrat.

Montana fires a warning shot over states’ rights
State is trying to trigger a battle over gun control — and make a point

updated 4:54 p.m. ET April 29, 2009

HELENA, Mont. – Montana is trying to trigger a battle over gun control — and perhaps make a larger point about what many folks in this ruggedly independent state regard as a meddlesome federal government.

In a bill passed by the Legislature earlier this month, the state is asserting that guns manufactured in Montana and sold in Montana to people who intend to keep their weapons in Montana are exempt from federal gun registration, background check and dealer-licensing rules because no state lines are crossed.

That notion is all but certain to be tested in court.

The immediate effect of the law could be limited, since Montana is home to just a few specialty gun makers, known for high-end hunting rifles and replicas of Old West weapons, and because their out-of-state sales would automatically trigger federal control.

Legal showdown
Still, much bigger prey lies in Montana’s sights: a legal showdown over how far the federal government’s regulatory authority extends.

“It’s a gun bill, but it’s another way of demonstrating the sovereignty of the state of Montana,” said Democratic Gov. Brian Schweitzer, who signed the bill.

Carrie DiPirro, a spokeswoman for the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, had no comment on the legislation. But the federal government has generally argued that it has authority under the interstate commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution to regulate guns because they can so easily be transported across state lines.

Guns and states’ rights both play well in Montana, the birthplace of the right-wing Freemen militia and a participant in the Sagebrush Rebellion of the 1970s and ’80s, during which Western states clashed with Washington over grazing and mineral extraction on federal land.

Montana’s leading gun rights organization, more hardcore than the National Rifle Association, boasts it has moved 50 bills through the Legislature over the past 25 years. And lawmakers in the Big Sky State have rebelled against federal control of everything from wetland protection to the national Real ID system.

‘Made in Montana’
Under the new law, guns intended only for Montana would be stamped “Made in Montana.” The drafters of the law hope to set off a legal battle with a simple Montana-made youth-model single-shot, bolt-action .22 rifle. They plan to find a “squeaky clean” Montanan who wants to send a note to the ATF threatening to build and sell about 20 such rifles without federal dealership licensing.

If the ATF tells them it’s illegal, they will sue and take the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, if they can.

Similar measures have also been introduced in Texas and Alaska.

“I think states have got to stand up or else most of their rights are going to be buffaloed by the administration and by Congress,” said Texas state Rep. Leo Berman.

Critics say exempting guns from federal laws anywhere would undermine efforts to stem gun violence everywhere.

Hot Air has the text of the law, titled:

AN ACT EXEMPTING FROM FEDERAL REGULATION UNDER THE COMMERCE CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES A FIREARM, A FIREARM ACCESSORY, OR AMMUNITION MANUFACTURED AND RETAINED IN MONTANA; AND PROVIDING AN APPLICABILITY DATE. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:

This is defiance as a thing of art:

It is a determination to keep fighting for one’s freedom no matter how hopeless things might look:

And why is this level of defiance necessary? An image worth a thousand curses suffices by way of explanation:

Don’t think this isn’t a direct response to Barack Hussein.

Gun and ammunition sales have soared out of naked fear of Obama.

And for good reason: Obama is pushing a treaty to ban reloading. Liberals are trying to regulate the components of ammunition as explosives and thus restrict ammunition. Liberals in California are nakedly attempting to circumvent the 2nd Amendment by regulating ammunition, hence making guns useless.

And the liberal campaign to deprive Americans of their 2nd Amendment guarantees (even as they discover “penumbras and emanations” in the Constitution that let them kill babies) is only a distant side issue in the massive government takeover of American society. Obama’s massive spending – more than every president from George Washington to George W. Bush COMBINED – will leave this country with an insurmountable national debt that would exceed 82 percent of the overall economy by 2019 and threaten this country’s very survival. We are now on the hook for $12.8 TRILLION dollars in government spending and commitments in the brave new world of the Obama economy.

We’ve got a president who is firing CEOs, stacking boards of directors, changing the rules for the auto manufacturers’ bankruptcy filings in order to favor the unions that supported him over the secured creditors. And if they don’t like it, they are met with frightening threats from the administration and death threats from union members. If that isn’t bad enough, we’ve also got card check on the horizon, which would allow union thugs to intimidate workers into unionizing with the union allowed to know exactly how each worker voted.

We’ve got a president who won’t let banks repay bailout loans (which in many cases were literally forced on them in the first place) so he can continue to impose onerous terms and conditions on them and control what they do and how they do it.

We’ve got a president who is planning to nationalize health care – and the one-sixth of our economy that it represents – even as he moves to impose costly and burdensome cap-and-trade regulations that would (in Obama’s own words) necessarily cause energy prices to soar.

And we’ve got a president who is attempting to nationalize student loans such that private lenders are phased out altogether. If Obama gets his way, the government will loan directly to families and students, making them directly indebted to the federal government. The government will necessarily get to decide which students, which schools, and which academic programs get loans. An option for students is to repay their loans by means of “national service,” which already precludes any type of religious service whatsoever. The potential of liberal big government harnessing student labor to staff liberal organizations such as ACORN is becoming all-too real.

We have a new administration that moved to criminalize political differences by targeting Bush officials as war criminals, even as returning veterans and pro-life Americans are labeled as “rightwing extremists” in a DHS report sent out to the nation’s law enforcement agencies and police departments.

I’ve been saying something over and over in different ways. What the liberals are doing now will ultimately result in a “rightwing” backlash. What is true in physics is true in politics: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Liberals are pushing and pushing and pushing through one new massive spending program and one new policy after another that will change and undermine this country forever afterward.

Under Obama, terrorism is now called an “overseas contingency operation” and terror attacks are now nothing more than “man-caused disasters.” In attacking the CIA as a means to attack Bush, Obama has created a depressed, sullen, and angry morale which promises to transfer into “cover your ass” caution and bureaucratic gamesmanship. He has undermined our security to a shocking degree. If we are attacked, this country will swing so far to the right so fast it will be absolutely unreal.

But even if we are not attacked, our country will likely implode under its own weight: trillions of dollars of reckless spending will have that effect as our dollar devalues and our interest payments on the debt begin to soar when inflation begins to take its toll. Ultimately our taxes will skyrocket due to all of this spending. CBS News has an article from March entitled, “If China Stops Lending Us Money, Look Out.” Well, guess what? They’re doing exactly that. They’re canceling our credit card.

In a poll of chief executive officers taken prior to the election, 74 percent of the executives said they feared “that an Obama presidency would be disastrous for the country.” And some of the CEOs predicted that “some of his programs would bankrupt the country within three years, if implemented.” And with the Congress in nearly total Democratic control, they ARE being implemented.

When Obama and the Democrats bankrupt the country and undermine our entire social structure with massive spending programs and massive bureaucracies that cannot be undone, which direction will the country turn? And how complete will that turnaround be?

Liberals are ignoring one ominous warning of popular outrage after another, claiming that conservatism and the Republican Party are dead. And they will likely ignore what is going on in Montana – which is led by a Democrat governor – as well. They are doing so to both their party’s and their country’s peril.

Montana, you’ve done a great thing for liberty, which is freedom from the growing tyranny of the smiley-face-fascist nanny state.

The backlash against big government liberal tyranny is beginning. And it will become larger and hotter as Obama’s policies take their toll. Let us hope that the spark turns into a fire before – rather than after – Obama has done too much damage to recover from.